Welcome to Data.gov
<http://www.data.gov/>
The purpose of Data.gov is to increase public access to high value, machine
readable datasets generated by the Executive Branch of the Federal Government.
Although the initial launch of Data.gov provides a limited portion of the rich
variety of Federal datasets presently available, we invite you to actively
participate in shaping the future of Data.gov by suggesting additional
datasets and site enhancements to provide seamless access and use of your
Federal data. Visit today with us, but come back often. With your help,
Data.gov will continue to grow and change in the weeks, months, and years ahead.
Thursday, 4 June 2009
USA: Datagov
Posted by MarkP at 18:25 0 comments
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
World Bank Investigative Body Keeps Disclosure Policy Secret
-----Original Message-----
From: freedominfo.org [mailto:FREEDOMINFO@HERMES.GWU.EDU] On Behalf Of
freedominfo.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:17 AM
To: FREEDOMINFO@HERMES.GWU.EDU
Subject: World Bank Investigative Body Keeps Disclosure Policy Secret
freedominfo.org - Update, June 1, 2009
World Bank Investigative Body Keeps Disclosure Policy Secret (IFTI Watch)
World Bank Investigative Body Keeps Disclosure Policy Secret (IFTI Watch)
The World Bank's Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) is considering rewriting
its policy on disclosure, but is keeping its five-year-old existing policy
under wraps. The IEG's disclosure policy was written in 2004. An IEG
official offered no explanation for not disclosing the disclosure policy,
and said May 18 that posting it is under consideration. Calls to IEG for
further comment May 28 and 29 were not returned.
_________________________________________________________________________
freedominfo.org is a one-stop portal that describes best practices,
consolidates lessons learned, explains campaign strategies and tactics, and
links the efforts of freedom of information advocates around the world. It
contains crucial information on freedom of information laws and how they
were drafted and implemented, including how various provisions have worked
in practice.
_________________________________________________________________________
PRIVACY NOTICE freedominfo.org does not and will never share the names or
e-mail addresses of its subscribers with any other organization. We would
welcome your input, and any information you care to share with us about your
special interests. But we do not sell or rent any information about
subscribers to any other party.
_________________________________________________________________________
Posted by MarkP at 23:59 0 comments
USA: Obama Memorandum re. Classified Information and Controlled Unclassified Information
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_______________________________________________
For Immediate Release May 27, 2009
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
SUBJECT: Classified Information and Controlled Unclassified Information
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Presidential-Memorandum-Classified-Information-and-Controlled-Unclassified-Information/>
As outlined in my January 21, 2009, memoranda to the heads of executive
departments and agencies on Transparency and Open Government and on the
Freedom of Information Act, my Administration is committed to operating with
an unprecedented level of openness. While the Government must be able to
prevent the public disclosure of information where such disclosure would
compromise the privacy of American citizens, national security, or other
legitimate interests, a democratic government accountable to the people must
be as transparent as possible and must not withhold information for
self-serving reasons or simply to avoid embarrassment.
To these ends, I hereby direct the following:
Section 1. Review of Executive Order 12958. (a) Within 90 days of the date of
this memorandum, and after consulting with the relevant executive departments
and agencies (agencies), the Assistant to the President for National Security
Affairs shall review Executive Order 12958, as amended (Classified National
Security Information), and submit to me recommendations and proposed revisions
to the order.
(b) The recommendations and proposed revisions shall address:
(i) Establishment of a National Declassification Center to bring appropriate
agency officials together to perform collaborative declassification review
under the administration of the Archivist of the United States;
(ii) Effective measures to address the problem of over classification,
including the possible restoration of the presumption against classification,
which would preclude classification of information where there is significant
doubt about the need for such classification, and the implementation of
increased accountability for classification decisions;
(iii) Changes needed to facilitate greater sharing of classified information
among appropriate parties;
(iv) Appropriate prohibition of reclassification of material that has been
declassified and released to the public under proper authority;
(v) Appropriate classification, safeguarding, accessibility, and
declassification of information in the electronic environment, as recommended
by the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States
Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction and others; and
(vi) Any other measures appropriate to provide for greater openness and
transparency in the Government's security classification and declassification
program while also affording necessary protection to the Government's
legitimate interests.
Sec. 2. Review of Procedures for Controlled Unclassified Information. (a)
Background. There has been a recognized need in recent years to enhance
national security by establishing an information sharing environment that
facilitates the sharing of terrorism-related information among government
personnel addressing common problems across agencies and levels of government.
The global nature of the threats facing the United States requires that our
Nation's entire network of defenders be able rapidly to share sensitive but
unclassified information so that those who must act have the information they
need.
To this end, efforts have been made to standardize procedures for designating,
marking, and handling information that had been known collectively as
"Sensitive But Unclassified" (SBU) information. Sensitive But Unclassified
refers collectively to the various designations used within the Federal
Government for documents and information that are sufficiently sensitive to
warrant some level of protection, but that do not meet the standards for
national security classification. Because each agency has implemented its own
protections for categorizing and handling SBU, there are more than 107 unique
markings and over 130 different labeling or handling processes and procedures
for SBU information.
A Presidential Memorandum of December 16, 2005, created a process for
establishing a single, standardized, comprehensive designation within the
executive branch for most SBU information. A related Presidential Memorandum
of May 9, 2008 (hereafter the "May 2008 Presidential Memorandum"), adopted the
phrase "Controlled Unclassified Information" (CUI) to refer to such
information. That memorandum adopted, instituted, and defined CUI as the
single designation for information within the scope of the CUI definition,
including terrorism-related information previously designated SBU. The
memorandum also established a CUI Framework for designating, marking,
safeguarding, and disseminating CUI terrorism-related information; designated
the National Archives and Records Administration as the Executive Agent
responsible for overseeing and managing implementation of the CUI Framework,
and created a CUI Council to perform an advisory and coordinating role.
The May 2008 Presidential Memorandum had the salutary effect of establishing a
framework for standardizing agency-specific approaches to designating
terrorism-related information that is sensitive but not classified. As
anticipated, the process of implementing the new CUI Framework is still
ongoing and is not expected to be completed until 2013. Moreover, the scope of
the May 2008 Presidential Memorandum is limited to terrorism-related
information within the information sharing environment. In the absence of a
single, comprehensive framework that is fully implemented, the persistence of
multiple categories of SBU, together with institutional and perceived
technological obstacles to moving toward an information sharing culture,
continue to impede collaboration and the otherwise authorized sharing of SBU
information among agencies, as well as between the Federal Government and its
partners in State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector.
Agencies and other relevant actors should continue their efforts toward
implementing the CUI framework. At the same time, new measures should be
considered to further and expedite agencies' implementation of appropriate
frameworks for standardized treatment of SBU information and information sharing.
(b) Interagency Task Force on CUI.
(i) The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, the Archivist of the United States,
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Director of National
Intelligence, the Program Manager, Information Sharing Environment
(established in section 1016 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004, as amended (6 U.S.C. 485)), and the CUI Council
(established in the May 2008 Presidential Memorandum), shall lead an
Interagency Task Force on CUI (Task Force). The Task Force shall be composed
of senior representatives from a broad range of agencies from both inside and
outside the information sharing environment.
(ii) The objective of the Task Force shall be to review current procedures for
categorizing and sharing SBU information in order to determine whether such
procedures strike the proper balance among the relevant imperatives. These
imperatives include protecting legitimate security, law enforcement, and
privacy interests as well as civil liberties, providing clear rules to those
who handle SBU information, and ensuring that the handling and dissemination
of information is not restricted unless there is a compelling need. The Task
Force shall also consider measures to track agencies' progress with
implementing the CUI Framework, other measures to enhance implementation of an
effective information sharing environment across agencies and levels of
government, and whether the scope of the CUI Framework should remain limited
to terrorism-related information within the information sharing environment or
be expanded to apply to all SBU information.
(iii) Within 90 days of the date of this memorandum, the Task Force shall
submit to me recommendations regarding how the executive branch should proceed
with respect to the CUI Framework and the information sharing environment. The
recommendations shall recognize and reflect a balancing of the following
principles:
(A) A presumption in favor of openness in accordance with my memoranda of
January 21, 2009, on Transparency and Open Government and on the Freedom of
Information Act;
(B) The value of standardizing the procedures for designating, marking, and
handling all SBU information; and
(C) The need to prevent the public disclosure of information where disclosure
would compromise privacy or other legitimate interests.
Sec. 3. General Provisions. (a) The heads of agencies shall assist and provide
information to the Task Force, consistent with applicable law, as may be
necessary to carry out the functions of their activities under this
memorandum. Each agency shall bear its own expense for participating in the
Task Force.
(b) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) Authority granted by law or Executive Order to an agency, or the head thereof;
(ii) Functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating
to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(c) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and
subject to the availability of appropriations.
(d) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or
benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any
party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its
officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Sec. 4. Publication. The Attorney General is hereby authorized and directed to
publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
BARACK OBAMA
# # #
Posted by MarkP at 17:25 0 comments
USA: Images, the Law and War
Images, the Law and War
<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/weekinreview/17liptak.htm>
By ADAM LIPTAK. May 17, 2009
WASHINGTON It was a hypothetical question in a Supreme Court argument, and
it was posed almost 40 years ago. But it managed to anticipate and in some
ways to answer President Obama's argument for withholding photographs showing
the abuse of prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan.
What if, Justice Potter Stewart asked a lawyer for The New York Times in the
Pentagon Papers case in 1971, a disclosure of sensitive information in wartime
"would result in the sentencing to death of 100 young men whose only offense
had been that they were 19 years old and had low draft numbers?" The Times's
lawyer, Alexander M. Bickel, tried to duck the question, but the justice
pressed him:
"You would say that the Constitution requires that it be published and that
these men die?"
Mr. Bickel yielded, to the consternation of allies in the case. "I'm afraid,"
he said, "that my inclinations of humanity overcome the somewhat more abstract
devotion to the First Amendment."
And there it was: an issue as old as democracy in wartime, and as fresh as the
latest dispute over pictures showing abuse of prisoners in the 21st century.
How much potential harm justifies suppressing facts, whether from My Lai or
Iraq, that might help the public judge the way a war is waged in its name?
The exchange also contained more than a hint of the court's eventual calculus:
The asserted harm can't be vague or speculative; it must be immediate and
concrete. It must be the sort of cost that gives a First Amendment lawyer pause.
As it happened, Mr. Bickel's response outraged the American Civil Liberties
Union and other allies of the newspaper in the Pentagon Papers case, which
concerned the Nixon administration's attempt to prevent publication of a
secret history of the Vietnam War. They disavowed Mr. Bickel's answer and said
the correct response was, "painfully but simply," that free people are
entitled to evaluate evidence concerning the government's conduct for themselves.
Which is a good summary of the interest on the other side: Scrutiny of abuses
by the government enhances democracy because it promotes accountability and
prompts reform.
Justice William O. Douglas, in a 1972 dissent in a case about Congressional
immunity, described his view of the basic dynamic. "As has been revealed by
such exposés as the Pentagon Papers, the My Lai massacres, the Gulf of Tonkin
'incident,' and the Bay of Pigs invasion," he wrote, "the government usually
suppresses damaging news but highlights favorable news."
Indeed, the Nixon administration successfully opposed the use of the Freedom
of Information Act to obtain the release of documents and photographs
concerning the killings of hundreds of South Vietnamese civilians in 1968 at
My Lai. (The decision led Congress to broaden that law.)
--snip--
Justice Stewart's answer, in his concurrence in the 6-to-3 decision, was that
assertions are not enough. "I cannot say," he wrote, that disclosure "will
surely result in direct, immediate and irreparable damage to our nation or its
people." In other contexts, too, the Supreme Court has endorsed limits on
speech only when it would cause immediate and almost certain harm to
identifiable people. More general and diffuse consequences have not done the
trick.
--snip--
But Jameel Jaffer, a lawyer with the civil liberties union, said history
favored disclosure, citing the 2004 photographs from Abu Ghraib and the 1991
video of police beating Rodney King in Los Angeles.
But the touchstone remains the Pentagon papers case. It not only framed the
issues, but also created a real-world experiment in consequences.
The government had argued, in general terms, that publication of the papers
would cost American soldiers their lives. The papers were published. What
happened?
David Rudenstine, the dean of the Cardozo Law School and author of "The Day
the Presses Stopped," a history of the case, said he investigated the
aftermath with an open mind.
"I couldn't find any evidence whatsoever from any responsible government
official," he said, "that there was any harm."
Posted by MarkP at 17:23 0 comments
Americas: Regional Findings and Plan of Action for the Advancement of the Right of Access to Information
AMERICAS REGIONAL FINDINGS AND PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE RIGHT
OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION
<http://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/peace/americas/Americas%20Regional%20Findings%20and%20Plan%20of%20Action%20May%202009.pdf>
We, 115 participants from 18 countries in the Americas, representing
governments, civil society organizations, international and regional bodies
and financial institutions, donor agencies and foundations, the private
sector, media outlets and scholars, gathered in Lima, Peru from April 28-30,
2009, under the auspices of The Carter Center, in collaboration with the
Organization of American States, the Andean Commission of Jurists and the
Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas, to advance the right of access
to information in the region.
--snip--
Posted by MarkP at 17:19 0 comments
Book: The Right to Information - A Global Perspective
The Right to Information: A Global Perspective
<http://www.lancerpublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=660>
Rs.395/- $20.00
This book will be the first comprehensive book in the market on a subject
which is of increasing global interest.
The right to information (or freedom of information) has now emerged as a key
component in credible democratic governance and is vital for promoting 'open
governance' and the accountability of public decision makers, as well as for
strengthening transparency, participation and the rule of law. The right to
information is not only fundamental for an open and democratic society, but is
a key weapon in the fight against poverty and corruption leading to
accelerating human development.
More than 80 countries already have an FOI/RTI law and others are proceeding
towards it. There are country-specific manuals and studies, there are many
websites devoted to FOI issues, but there is not a single book which looks at
the subject from a global perspective. The book is an attempt to fill this void.
Author: Prof. KM Shrivastava
ISBN: 1978-1-9355011-2
Pages: 184
Posted by MarkP at 17:15 0 comments
USA: Senate bans photo release, requires notice of FOIA changes
Senate bans photo release, requires notice of FOIA changes
<http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=10772>
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
The ACLU's effort to get photos documenting the treatment of detainees in Iraq
and Afghanistan was halted by the Senate on Thursday night, in an amendment to
the appropriations bill.
The Senate also agreed to require new laws that exempt information from
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act to specifically reference the
FOIA, making them easier for requesters to spot.
The two changes were part of the supplemental appropriations bill, which the
House already passed. The House and Senate will now reconcile the two versions
of the bill.
The photos amendment, sponsored by Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I.-Conn.) and
Lindsey Graham (R.-S.C.), creates a process for the Secretary of Defense to
certify to the president that the release of photos and video taken between
Sept. 11, 2001, and Jan. 22, 2009, of people captured by U.S. forces outside
the United States would endanger lives. In such cases, the release could be
prohibited for at least three years.
The process would allow President Obama to stop the release of the photos the
American Civil Liberties Union sought with its FOIA suit. A federal district
court and the U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan (2nd Circuit) had ordered the
photos released. The Reporters Committee filed a friend-of-the-court brief in
support of the ACLU efforts.
Obama, after initially supporting the release, switched course recently and
opposed it; the Justice Department has been considering an appeal to the
Supreme Court. The new bill eliminates the need for a trip to the Court by
changing the statute that the Second Circuit said required the government to
release the photos.
The other amendment passed by the Senate will require all new statutes that
prohibit the release of records to clearly reference the Freedom of
Information Act.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, (D.-Vt.) had long been a proponent of such legislation.
Congress frequently attempts to enact legislation exempting specific records
from disclosure under FOIA, but it can be hard to spot the bills or know about
them after they are passed. Often they are buried in larger appropriations or
budget bills.
The change in language will help make the FOIA amendment process more transparent.
Posted by MarkP at 17:13 0 comments
Tajikistan: Strengthening freedom of information law and practice
Strengthening freedom of information law and practice in Tajikistan
<http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=28705&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html>An international workshop has produced a set of recommendations aimed at strengthening the right to information in Tajikistan. Entitled "Right to Information in Tajikistan: Law and Practice", the workshop took place from 1 to 3 May 2009 in Khodja Obi Garm, outside of the Tajik capital, Dushanbe.
The workshop offered participants an opportunity to discuss in depth the new law on information signed by the President the Republic of Tajikistan in August 2008. Authors of this Tajik law, together with policy makers, and international and local experts on access to information, analyzed the law during the three-day event. A representative from the London-based organization focusing on freedom of expression and freedom of information, Article 19, contributed a human rights perspective to the discussion.
Participants engaged in a lively debate; experts compared the compatibility of the Tajik information law with the current information environment, as well as with international standards. They gained understanding of the role of access to information in general and of the benefit for Tajikistan from the application of international standards in particular.
The recommendations adopted at the workshop reflect the common desire among participants for improving the legal basis for access to information in Tajikistan. They have now been released for public dissemination and use by Tajik policymakers in further development and implementation of the law. The full text of these recommendations is available in PDF document below.
File
workshop_recommendations.pdf
Posted by MarkP at 17:07 0 comments
Egypt: ANHRI releases annual freedom of expression report
ANHRI releases annual freedom of expression report
<http://www.ifex.org/egypt/2009/05/28/annual_report/>
28 May 2009
(ANHRI/IFEX) - Cairo, May 24, 2009 - The Arabic Network for Human Rights
Information stated today that 2008 witnessed a great expansion in the use of
the Emergency Law by Egyptian authorities against a large number of
journalists and bloggers, as well as a noticeable increase in physical
assaults and abductions committed against them, since authorities refuse to
investigate these attacks.
Despite the fact that the Network recorded a decline in the number of cases
brought against journalists and bloggers in 2008 compared with 2007, the
violations that took place in 2008 were more violent and more severe, as the
police have, in many cases, tended to impose extrajudicial punishments on
those who hold different opinions, through abduction or physical abuse, and
many of these practices occurred outside Cairo.
The annual report also monitored a number of examples of religious and
political Hisba lawsuits (cases filed by private parties in the name of
protecting state interests), a growing phenomenon in recent years as lawyers
and religious men seek to gain fame or flatter the Egyptian government by
filing Hisba cases against creative writers and journalists.
The report addresses the government persecution of satellite channels,
including the American-owned Al-Hurra, the Iranian-owned Al-Alam, along with
companies that provide direct broadcast service to a large number of satellite
channels, such as the Cairo News Company.
The report also provides a long list of books and magazines that were
confiscated in 2008, and distinguishes between the bodies which confiscate
literary works by legal means and bodies that confiscate publications in
violation of the law, noting with concern that the latter is the more
prominent in the list of confiscated works.
Posted by MarkP at 17:04 0 comments
Monday, 1 June 2009
USA: Right-to-Know Network
RTKNet.ORG: PROTECTING ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
<http://www.rtknet.org/>
Welcome to the redesigned Right-to-Know Network, an information hub helping
advocates push for improved access to government held information on the
environment, health, and safety. Please let us know what you think about the
site's new look and features.
News in Brief
Action Alerts and Campaigns
Databases
Issues
Advocacy Center
RTK Spotlight
----
Mark Perkins MLIS, MCLIP
www.markperkins.info
Posted by MarkP at 23:51 0 comments